The graphs illustrate how many people had a trip to Ashdown Museum and the reaction of these people before and after the redecoration of this location.
Overall, looking at the graph, it is immediately clear that there was an upward trend in the number of guests and improved in their opinions with this change.
The years before 74 thousand people had a trip to visit Museum and everyone almost got a negative impression with the locations. In particular, 40% of perspectives were not only comfortable with this site, but also the proportion of visitors were high extremely unpleasant rate, reaching 30%. Meanwhile, only one-tenth of the total percent felt happy with this condition, in addition, it was still received some considerate altitudes with 15%.
The decoration witnessed an enormous difference, the museum was gained the enjoyment of the public. There were three in four rates of visitors, who were in favor of this development, a rise of 40%. It, though, still has some shortcomings, accounting for 20% unpleasant opinions and dropping significantly by 30%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oved in their opinions with this change. The years before 74 thousand people had ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, still, while, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23699421965 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93937314137 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64161849711 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4641093216 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.428571429 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184183538259 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739729833773 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469806009332 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101027279478 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038490108144 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.