Nowadays, ordering food has gained popularity and received a great deal of public attention while some people support that traditional eating food is beneficial to the environment and the economy, I believe that the advantages of this traditional way would outstrip the advantages( this trend is not without disadvantages, though, the upsides will justify these)
On the one hand, there are some drawbacks of the consumption of local food. Firstly, customers are able to spend a period time and money on arriving the destination such as restaurants or stores, therefore, some situations are too waste for them. For example, if it is without the transport, someone is in Vietnam and they are willing to try KimChi of Korea so it is almost impossible. Furthermore, a location, which has gained a reputation, is always crowded and noisy because of a large massive of eaters. A common image in LY Quốc Sư noodle is a range of people standing in front of the restaurant to taste a delicious dish.
However, it is not negative that the benefits of this way are outweighed by the drawback. Initial, regarding the economy of the local sites, this is an opportunity to make substantial profits. This is proved by the local food is an important part, which has engaged travelers' attention at some tourist destinations. In term of the environment, this way assists the local to reduce the garbage using packing foods. In addition, the favor of dishes seem to be fascinating and outstanding if it is tasted at its production location, and the seasoning of foods do not have some preservative substance, which is likely to harm than good for health.
To sum up, ordering food is more and more common in modern life. The traditional way, though, is not without downsides about the spending time and hectic locations. But it is not negative the upsides would justify on the point of environment view and economic view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., though, the upsides will justify these On the one hand, there are some drawback...
^^^
Line 2, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e restaurant to taste a delicious dish. However, it is not negative that the ben...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93167701863 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86833481729 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555900621118 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.315523801 49.4020404114 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.153846154 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213565908033 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059695435144 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662781735303 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120139103782 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435749380877 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.