Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The significance of economic progress which was always debatable has become more contentious with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others disagree. In my opinion, economical growth and infrastructural development both are playing a vital role for a country. This essay will explicate both the perspectives with examples in the looming paragraphs.
Analyzing the statement and explaining further the first and important reason behind this is that create more jobs due to many students are graduated from university every year. Besides, freshers are contributing to economic progress in country. In addition, increasing export different types of products to foreign countries and importing less items which is hit to GDP. For example, a survey done by 'BD Government' in 2021 approximately 75% of foreign currency are earning by export garments accessories to different countries. Moreover, government should be exported more men power to other countries, getting vast of remittance. Hence, it is clearly mentioned that why many are support to economic growth.
However, some people deem that other types of improvements are an essential for a country. To take an example, authority should concatenate about health system and infrastructure development for wealthy economic. Furthermore, built in new hospitals in rural are getting proper treatment to poor people which are helping to work hard in a country. Last but not the least, communication is playing a vital role for economic development such as roads and transportations. Therefore, government should be built more roads and highways for improving to make profitable.
In conclusion, according to the arguments mentioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of economic development in a country are to indeed too great. Nevertheless, its potentials drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...l while others disagree. In my opinion, economical growth and infrastructural development ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun items is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ucts to foreign countries and importing less items which is hit to GDP. For example,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ountries. Moreover, government should be exported more men power to other countri...
^^
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ries, getting vast of remittance. Hence, it is clearly mentioned that why many ar...
^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wbacks should not be overlooked either.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5818815331 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16519024127 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599303135889 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1082261889 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222710115961 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676089999854 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438582722437 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120545110785 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530694212452 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...l while others disagree. In my opinion, economical growth and infrastructural development ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun items is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ucts to foreign countries and importing less items which is hit to GDP. For example,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ountries. Moreover, government should be exported more men power to other countri...
^^
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ries, getting vast of remittance. Hence, it is clearly mentioned that why many ar...
^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wbacks should not be overlooked either.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5818815331 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16519024127 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599303135889 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1082261889 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222710115961 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676089999854 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438582722437 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120545110785 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530694212452 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.