Many jobs in the home nowadays can be done by machine. Has it brought more advantage than disadvantage.
It is undoubted that, more and more people use modern technologies to do housework. In my opinion, this development is positive and negative in equal measure.
On the one hand, there are some countable disadvantages to the automate work. Firstly, utilizing machines to do chores will be expensive and not environment-friendly. In fact, modern technologies need a great deal of energies to operate such as washing machines and gas stove, leading the increase of cost of living as well as the lack of water and other resources. In addition, the modern machines that do housework are not as clean as people. For example, individuals mostly wash clothes by hand and just use laundry machines to make them dry faster.
On the other hand, the advantages of up-to-date technologies should not be underestimated. One dominant benefit is that the smart devices are convenient and save people’s time. Indeed, instead of doing housework, residents can spend quality time doing their jobs, enabling them to earn more money, improving their living standards.Furthermore, household technologies have made homes safer, cleaner. For instance, before people used many stoves that came from coal, wood or other solid fuels. The heat could not be easily controlled and they were often smokey and messy so homes were routinely covered with a dust and the introduction of vacuum cleaner helped people clean up whole the house, enhancing the quality of air.
In conclusion, the popularity of housework machines has both positive and negative for the humanity life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ere are some countable disadvantages to the automate work. Firstly, utilizing machines to do...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...money, improving their living standards.Furthermore, household technologies have made homes...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28629032258 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11338110572 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637096774194 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9165046703 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.846153846 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3076923077 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0989312415492 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316952607572 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378632419148 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0509009798931 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471429853135 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.