Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not the local people. Why is this case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
It is so true that museums and historical places are virtually visited by travellers but not the local residents. There are several reasons for this but this situation should be tackled by attracting locals in some practical ways.
There are two main reasons why museums and historical attractions are preferred by tourists than by local people. The first one is that they are so familiar to the local residents. If these places have not refreshed or changed anything for a long time, locals will not want to visit museums and historical sites many times to see the same thing. Another reason is the price of entrance tickets. It is likely that those tickets are sold for tourists with the economy’s benefit because it is too expensive, compared with the local’s living standard.
Steps should be taken by the government to address this situation. Firstly, the local authority should provide more budget for renewing these museums as well as rebuilding some ruins in the historical places. The fresher these places are, the more local residents will be attracted by them. Secondly, the locals must be charged lower than other tourists. Without any considering about the expense, the local people will be willing to broaden their knowledge about history in their city. For example, more and more locals in Hue city, Vietnam, visited museums and historical sites in their leisure time due to adopting the new policy of lowering ticket’s price for the local people.
In conclusion, there are reasons for this situation. However, the authorities should take some steps to attract more local people
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-25 | hathinguyen202 | 67 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons relevant. 67
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes is banned. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck to what extent do you agree or disagree 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some steps to attract more local people
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15969581749 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59204619276 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539923954373 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7593069155 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474359745988 0.244688304435 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160051875629 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998830396487 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298450920753 0.151304729494 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704535992273 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.