Many museums charge admission fees while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
There are many museums which do not charge fees while there are other museums which charge admission. This essay will argue that the disadvantages of charging fees outweigh the advantages. This essay will first demonstrate that charging no fees in the museum will enrich culture because it will attract more people and that the poor can also visit it, followed by a prime disadvantage of lack of maintenance money for museums, which is not valid.
One of the major advantages of not taking entrance fees in museums is that it will enrich the culture. More people are attracted towards the museum and they can learn many things about the past tradition of their country. The development of knowledge about the past culture will help to retain the culture of a place. For example, countries like China and India, do not charge museum fees. Due to this, they attracted many people to museums and preserve their culture. Free entry in museums also gives chance to the poor to visit it. The poor can also enjoy and admire the history of their country. For example, in India, where 25% of people are living below the poverty line, the poor can visit and appreciate the past of the country because there are no admission charges.
One possible drawback is that the museum will not generate enough money for its maintenance. However, this argument is not correct. The museum managers can find sponsors who will help in the maintenance of it and in return museums can do publicity of the organizations. For instance in Africa, there are big companies which give money to support museums and in return museums advertise their products.
In conclusion, charging no admission in the museum will attract more public who can learn the past culture that will help in retaining the culture of a society and poor can also visit museums outweigh the flawed argument of lack of maintenance money for the museum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se there are no admission charges. One possible drawback is that the museum...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88271604938 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44254977078 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.407407407407 0.561755894193 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0038441288 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388334005367 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142610682722 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106538630599 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260594707481 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667718120611 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.