Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, one of main destination for individuals who are fond of historical places has been museum. In some countries lots of them ask for particular amount of money as their admission. Although it has obtained several benefits for society, I myself believe it has more drawbacks which outweigh the positive aspects.
To commence with, this issue has gained several benefits for art portion. By implementing expensive admission for entering art exhibitions, lots of money would add to art industry. This has propelled that portion to have more opportunities to hold many upcoming events with saving the considerable amount of money. Resulting of the mentioned act, producing and preparing more and more of those museums and other kinds of art productions would occur. This has been one of the significant result of not only attracting more tourists, but also obtaining more money in order to heighten the quality.
On the other hand, charging people especially local ones to pay amount of money in order to allow them to enter museums, may have several adverse impacts on them. This action could perform like a deterrent for interested people not to come to these mentioned places. It is true, this issue may not be considered by foreign visitors who have come for their holiday in the country and do not care about the price. On the opposite, it may have negative effects on native people’s enthusiasm for visiting these places. For example, although an Iranian citizen have wanted to go to art exhibitions, if they do not have enough payment, they will pass up just because of its high charge. As a result, the number of their visitors may decline for that.
In conclusion, regarding the substantial points of this action which has been applied by many museums, lots of people including myself think of it as an adverse effect more than positive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00967741935 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65464272392 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558064516129 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3423289186 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.533333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220875486823 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730433715724 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300266569755 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121097562786 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384669152624 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.