Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
The significance of admission charge for museums, which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others disagree
However, most of the museums take entrance fee when some are free. In my option, fixing entry fee for individuals is more logical. This essay will elaborate the merits surpass the demerits in the looming paragraphs.
To begin with a huge number of museums fix a certain amount for people who want to visit, whereas a small number of museums make it free for all. Therefore, charging fee for entry has more advantages outweigh the disadvantages, it helps to maintain properly. with numerous activities such as cleaning, repairing, paying bills and so on. To take an example, many museums utilize the fund which comes from entry fee through buying antic goods from ancient areas and most of them are making handmade tools to show people. Moreover, many are giving this money for charity, which helps to poor. Thus, it is clearly mentioned above to take free for museums is more beneficial.
On the other hand, there are a few numbers of demerits while taking charge from individuals due to many people, who are unable to pay extra for visiting museums they do not show Interest and never go to see ancient tools with children. As a result, they are unable to know about tradition as well as current world.
To sum up, according to the arguments mentioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of entry fee for museums Indeed too great. However, although it has some problems, as should be tackled this situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...t for people who want to visit, whereas a small number of museums make it free for all. Therefore...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...antages, it helps to maintain properly. with numerous activities such as cleaning, r...
^^^^
Line 8, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eums Indeed too great. However, although it has some problems, as should be tackl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91605839416 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53115543357 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591240875912 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1511852348 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.615384615 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369232301237 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114541290254 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102641630336 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186692558103 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859882575201 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.