The table below shows the rate at which people saved money , expressed as a percentage of GDP , in seven countries from 1990 to 2008.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table chart compares the percentage of GDP which individuals saved money in seven different countries in 1990, 3000 and 2008.
Overall, it can be deemed that Singapore and South Korea had highest at savings than others, while Italy and United States had lowest rate in three
different years.
First of all, in 1990, people from China got 35.6 GDP when South Korea Ova 37 7 GDP also similar. Whereas, Germany, India and Italy were almost same 25.3, 23.0 and 20.8 namely and Singapore 48.6 was the highest for savings as while United Sates had lowest rate at 15.3. In 2000, China, Singapore and South Korea had the percentages between 33.6 to 46.9 and Germany, India and Italy were 20.2, 23.8 and 20.6 respectively. However, United States had no more then 17.7 GDP. Lastly In 2008, China more higher than others countries with 53.2 GDP and United States was no than 12.1 GDP and Italy also almost similar with 18.2. Therefore, Germany, India and south Korea were saved by from 26.0 to 33.6 GDP, when Singapore had 48.3 GDP.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
...n others, while Italy and United States had lowest rate in three different years. Firs...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 246, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
...ghest for savings as while United Sates had lowest rate at 15.3. In 2000, China, Singapore...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 457, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ely. However, United States had no more then 17.7 GDP. Lastly In 2008, China more hi...
^^^^
Line 6, column 494, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...re then 17.7 GDP. Lastly In 2008, China more higher than others countries with 53.2 GDP and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 564, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ies with 53.2 GDP and United States was no than 12.1 GDP and Italy also almost sim...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77777777778 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.08448116528 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572222222222 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.9953702551 43.030603864 216% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 143.333333333 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8333333333 5.23603664747 264% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190966449489 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12005206216 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976076811734 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173079588747 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110055193812 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.