Nowadays, the law is protecting many old buildings due to its historical value. On the other hand, many people believe that these building should be replaced with the new ones because of the need of houses and offices. In this essay, I will show how important it is to protect the old buildings and answer if history should leave behind progress.
There are many reasons why maintaining old buildings is essential. First of all, these buildings have educational values. By visiting historical architectures, youngsters will understand more clearly about history of their countries. Moreover, instead of some dull lessons, students will be more enjoyable if they can see the historical sites face-to-face and it will boost their interestment in history. Secondly, old buildings represent a country cultural identity. For examples, when a foreign visit Ha Noi, they always looking for Uncle Ho’s tomb, or when they visit Washington D.C, white house is the signature sites of the city that everyone wants to visit. Therefore, if the old buildings are knocked down, a part of cultural identity will loss. For those reasons, maintaining old buildings is vital.
In addition, history should not stand in the way of progress. The primary reason is that it will be a big loss if people loose their history identity. Although development is necessary, it is also important that the progress go along with historical aspect so that people will not loose their culture.
To sum up, maintaining old buildings is a unreplace process of every countries and history and progress should go together.
- Children who start reading earlier in life perform better later on in their school studies How important are early reading skills in a child s academic performance What other preschool factors influence a child s later academic achievements Give reasons f 80
- There are many types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important and should be preserved or is international music that is heard everywhere nowadays more useful to a society 73
- Nowadays traffic in major cities is worsening What problems does it create How can we help solve these problems as individuals Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of nation s history However some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices How important is t to maintain old buildings S 71
- Nowadays families are not as close as they used to be what do you think are the causes of this what can be done to make families closer 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 584, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: C
...s tomb, or when they visit Washington D.C, white house is the signature sites of ...
^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...is that it will be a big loss if people loose their history identity. Although develo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...storical aspect so that people will not loose their culture. To sum up, maintaining...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...To sum up, maintaining old buildings is a unreplace process of every countries an...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77743673166 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5168422057 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475335464061 0.244688304435 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169123927423 0.084324248473 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102080604865 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278631881698 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137693140937 0.056905535591 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.