There is no doubt that children without enough time from their parents is a consequential matter in modern society. This difficult issue due to bad children behavior and game addiction but can be solved by making children well being policy to regulate their parents working time.
Oh the issue of not spending enough time with children, a key factor is that children will have bad behavior. It is vital to understand that low care create a situation in which children can do whatever they want without any control. This situation generates outcome whereby children will get bad behavior and do not trust and obey anyone. There is further effects in the form of friend addiction which children close to their friend more than their parents, so they will believe in their friend instead of believe in their parents.
Another important element in lonely children is being game addict. As a consequence of the fact that children and lonely, so they decide to spend time playing games. It is similarly true that children who addict to games, not care of others people including their parents. In this regard, statistic of game participation in a prominent example, showing that percentage of players who under 18 years old was the highest.
This writer take the view that a solution to problem lies with children well-being policy. It should be abundantly clear that parents have to spend time working hard for salaries to maintain their family well-being. In the content, one can see why policy can help to regulate work time so parents can be able to take care their children after work. Thus a plan for action should include regulation of work time policy, which will support parents to have enough time to take care of children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 340, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are further effects'?
Suggestion: There are further effects
...avior and do not trust and obey anyone. There is further effects in the form of friend addiction which c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'takes'.
Suggestion: takes
...years old was the highest. This writer take the view that a solution to problem lie...
^^^^
Line 4, column 349, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...to take care their children after work. Thus a plan for action should include regula...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, thus, well, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88775510204 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44102307272 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6598354562 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.642857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369881976685 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14063254423 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673292250668 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241003966908 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745985595583 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.