Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce goods.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal
Nowadays several people support the statement that the increasing productivity of commodities and supplies should be the prerequisite target of every nation throughout the world. From my perspective, while it is irrefutable that producing materials and goods is important, other national factors should not be underestimated
On the one hand, the beneficial impacts of the growing productivity of materials and commodities on the development of a nation are undeniable. For the most part, the fundamental benefit is it made a great contribution to national economic growth. It can be said that manufacturing reached a certain level and satisfied the domestic requirement, supplies and commodities can be exported to earn foreign currencies as well as stock cannot generate locally. Another advantage that is worth mentioning is that commodities are very essential to stabilize society in emergency circumstances, especially in natural catastrophes including prolonged drought, earthquake or tsunami, to mention but a few. By accumulating a great number of victuals and foodstuffs, they can be used to provide assistance to regions hit by natural disasters
Nevertheless, if nations just have only goal which increase production, a variety of issues can transpire. One factorial is firmly stand out is aboutenvironmental protection. It is apparent that environment in general and ecosystem in particular play a pivotal role in the sustainable development of one country. By the way of illustration, if environmental conditions is exchanged for economical profit, which showed most prominently through overexploitation and pollution, the consequences will be reflected in the deterioration of the health and longevity of citizens. In the second place, the educational system is also need to be considered. There seems to be shred of evidence that the excessive emphasized on productivity of goods may lead to the materialism lifestyle and the degradation of moral values
In conclusion, despite the economical and social stabilization values that increasing productivity of materials and commodities bring to a nation, various other factors such as education and environment, also need to be emphasized for the comprehensive development
.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stood'.
Suggestion: stood
... can transpire. One factorial is firmly stand out is aboutenvironmental protection. I...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...d place, the educational system is also need to be considered. There seems to be shr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sized for the comprehensive development .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, as well as, by the way, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76576576577 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55690134879 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576576576577 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.484737566 49.4020404114 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.545454545 106.682146367 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2727272727 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.9090909091 7.06120827912 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152763729239 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510611479584 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549223761984 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102672094844 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613991251291 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 50.2224549098 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.78 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'stood'.
Suggestion: stood
... can transpire. One factorial is firmly stand out is aboutenvironmental protection. I...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...d place, the educational system is also need to be considered. There seems to be shr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sized for the comprehensive development .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, as well as, by the way, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76576576577 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55690134879 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576576576577 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.484737566 49.4020404114 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.545454545 106.682146367 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2727272727 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.9090909091 7.06120827912 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152763729239 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510611479584 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549223761984 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102672094844 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613991251291 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 50.2224549098 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.78 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.