It is true that countries should full-fill the main supply for local communities to cut-down imported products. In my opinion, I partially agree with why countries should full-fill the needs of the main food and the reason why those situations cannot be applied to all countries.
There are many advantages that will be taken by the country if they can occupy the main food for their inhabitants. First of all, by producing as many foods, the country will take an opportunity not to depend on other countries. Since the demand for main food will go high, the investment in foods that are needed by local communities will cheaper than the price from imported products. For instance, Indonesia is the one country that has a high demand for rice products. Then, the government manages Indonesia to be food supply-sufficiency by opening some rice fields. Furthermore, the price goes down caused by the economic principle where the supply is higher than the demand. Secondly, the objective of this will decrease the number of starvation in those countries. Due to food supply in large stock, the country will survive from food deficiency.
Although developing as many as main foods is a good proposal, some countries will still need multilateral corporation. For instance, UAE does not have fertile soil to produce basic food supply such as rice, vegetables, and fruit but it is the most country that produces the largest amount of fuel energy, whereas Indonesia has good fertile soil and this country need the sum of energy. Furthermore, both countries can create an agreement to support each other to do export-import.
In conclusion, although the objective of the countries is to supply local inhabitants by producing a certain number of the main food, some countries do not have this benefit because they do not have enough fertile soil so that they need other countries to import their main food.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03164556962 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76734309229 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487341772152 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2575692949 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214987459772 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881755982386 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446683641369 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147547624137 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185831117177 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.