Many people believe the formal "pen and paper" examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement.
Discuss this view and give your own opinion.
Through human's education, the examination is the only way to proof the quality of educational achievement. However, there is most common test type, pen-and-paper examination, nevertheless brings a controversial issue which is related to it. It is been widely known that this type creates questions that do not broaden the student's knowledge, and sometimes does not measure the real ability of people. In so forth, that is not regarded as the best method to accompany educational improvement of students.
First of all, the multiple choices questions had commonly appeared in a test -based-paper examination. The test takers only have to choose the right answer from three to four choices. This test apparently does not examine student's knowledge, but only assess their ability to guess. This is the easiest task which consequently does not extend the student's prior knowledge. Before the examination, they do not study on related compulsory books but they practice the existed question which is commonly asked in questions.
The second of, TBP (test based paper) examination scales the pupils base on a score that they receive from the test. However, the majority of score does not represent the whole students' credential. For example, students of art science who able to perform an action. They are conducted to take the examination on a paper-based test instead of real performance. They will require a basic knowledge, but, in another hand, their ability to perform will be weakened.
Above all, the formal assessment does not regain the educational standardisation among students. This type only develops the student's predictions, instead of their cognition. Moreover, the vocational science does not fit with this type. In addition, we have to reshape our examination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
Through humans education, the examination is the only ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...eates questions that do not broaden the students knowledge, and sometimes does not measu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...l. For example, students of art science who able to perform an action. They are conducte...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, for example, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35357142857 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95363620589 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564285714286 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5192973819 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.2777777778 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5555555556 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12844255209 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440523654048 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418262912667 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871547605265 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389365848558 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.