Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a common consensus that the authorities should take the dominant role in scientific experiments, in place of enterprises. I completely agree with this statement.
The first reason in favor of my argument is that private companies are easily tempted by the lucrative revenue and could neglect the consequences of their actions. Indeed, the fact that enterprises can earn a tremendous amount of profits from monopolistic technological advances justifies why they often prioritize the profits but neglect the potential hazards they might cause to society. For instance, several paper-making factories owned by private businesses have been recently recorded releasing their industrial waste straight to rivers and lakes which are then utilized by the general public. As a result, toxic substances contaminate the water sources and make them inconsumable.
Another reason supporting my view is that if governments are to develop and carry out technological projects, the community will gain substantial perks. Officials will make scientific research available for public usage and simultaneously enhance its citizens’ living standards, as well as the prosperity of the country. For example, various nations have set up high-end underground railway systems in metropolitan areas for public use. Without these developments, traffic will soon be overwhelmed by the increasing population and eventually end up in prolonged congestion, especially at peak hours.
In conclusion, drawbacks are evident when private enterprises hold a monopoly on scientific studies, I believe official authorities will perform far more effectively and wisely as the conductor of technological development projects.
Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nd lakes which are then utilized by the general public. As a result, toxic substances contamin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, well, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8503649635 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18181411667 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682481751825 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6675206268 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.307692308 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325942276793 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117286934496 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188024099695 0.0667982634062 281% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237783093198 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.336632724106 0.056905535591 592% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.