Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.

To what extent do you agree?

There is a widespread belief that social networking sites as facebook, twitter, LinkedIn and so on have had an enormous negative effects on both individuals and local communities. However, in my opinion, while I believe that this type of site proves beneficial, I agree that they have harmful influences on society and individuals.

Let us begin by looking at the advantages first, one of the most positives of it is that students can extremely benefit. To put it in another way, there are numerous articles, blogs and debates that are usually created by experienced professionals, writers and expe...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.

Votes
Average: 9.6 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...and so on have had an enormous negative effects on both individuals and local communiti...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...besity, fatty liver and even cancer. Also addiction has been reported in many peo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 285, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
..., these type of habits have detrimental affect on personality and education. That is to s...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, no doubt, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42469135802 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90463787778 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627160493827 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0066641731 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8636363636 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4090909091 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167209323074 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401534079053 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629812526477 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848308463278 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930578177962 0.056905535591 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Not only could youngsters attain conveniently, but also would discuss thoroughly.
Not only could youngsters attain conveniently, but also they would discuss thoroughly. //two sentences parallel

flaws:
5 paragraphs are enough. 2 paragraphs for the side you support more, while one paragraph for another side.

----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.5 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 405 350
No. of Characters: 2125 1500
No. of Different Words: 255 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.486 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.247 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.787 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 160 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 126 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 93 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.409 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.211 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.244 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.523 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.039 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5