Many people believe that social networking
sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge
negative impact on both individuals and
society
To what extent do you agree?
Social networking sites, for instance Facebook, are
thought by some to have had a detrimental effect on
individual people as well as society and local
communities. However, while I believe that such sites
are mainly beneficial to the individual, I agree that they
have had a damaging effect on local communities.
With regards to individuals, the impact that online
social media has had on each individual person has
clear advantages. Firstly, people from different
countries are brought together through such sites as
Facebook whereas before the development of
technology and social networking sites, people rarely
had the chance to meet or communicate with anyone
outside of their immediate circle or community
Secondly Facebook also has social groups which offer
Individuals a chance to meet and participate in
discussion with people who share common interests.
On the other hand, the effect that Facebook and other
social networking sites have had on societies and local
communities can only be seen as negative. Rather than
individual people taking part in their local community
they are instead choosing to take more interest in
people online, Consequently, the people within local
communities are no longer forming close or supportive
relationships. Furthermore, society as a whole is
becoming increasingly disjointed and fragmented as
people spend more time online with people they have
never met face to face and who they are unlikely to ever
meet in the future
To conclude, although social networking sites have
brought individuals closer together, they have not had
the same effect on society or local communities. Local
communities should do more to try and involve local
people in local activities in order to promote the future
of community life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Communities
...l people as well as society and local communities. However, while I believe that such sit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Have
... to the individual, I agree that they have had a damaging effect on local communit...
^^^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Clear
...has had on each individual person has clear advantages. Firstly, people from differ...
^^^^^
Line 35, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Discussion
...s a chance to meet and participate in discussion with people who share common interests....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 43, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Communities
...sites have had on societies and local communities can only be seen as negative. Rather th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 53, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Relationships
...no longer forming close or supportive relationships. Furthermore, society as a whole is b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 69, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ls closer together, they have not had the same effect on society or local communi...
^^^
Line 71, column 31, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
.... Local communities should do more to try and involve local people in local activit...
^^^^^^^
Line 75, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Of
...vities in order to promote the future of community life.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73021582734 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84842121918 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514388489209 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.739855216 49.4020404114 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 199.125 106.682146367 187% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.75 20.7667163134 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 18.625 7.06120827912 264% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 33.0 4.38176352705 753% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261912307417 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133028856871 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458666336331 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674726306818 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500157506946 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.9 13.0946893788 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.05 50.2224549098 40% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.55 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.