Many people believe that technological and science advance make food better, whereas some others believe that because of it, that food now is more harmful in people's life. Discuss both views and say your opinion.
Lifestyle has undergone a dramatic change over a couple of decades. Presently, technology is gaining prevalence all over the world. Myraid masses assert that technical gadgets are better to cook food. By contrast, others ponder that technological and science science are not healthy for them. Here , i would like to account for both views with my own perception.
There are multifarious benefits of this phenomena. First and foremost, science appliances enable to prepare food properly. For instance, people can use various gadgets such as roti-maker, ovan and cooker pressure that help them to make food better. Apart from it, they can not only make food tastefully but also prepare it easily.
Moving further on my point of view. These appliances balance the taste of food in less amount of time. To elaborate, in ovan individual can make or bake the food in very less period. Thus, they are expected to cook food healthy.
On contrary, others have conflicting views. To initiate with, these technical gadgets offer various types of ailments. To justify microwave pass many waves to heat the food as infrared, micro and so on which give birth copious disease. Hence,people are likely to become the victim of chronic ailments.
From my point of view, both aspects have their own significance. Some individual acknowledged that these appliances are fruitful to cook the food while others think that it is detrimental for them. However, it is an advisable that these gadgets help us to save our time.
To recapitulate, undeniable, with these advance mechanisms they can get nutritious food that is beneficial to keep body fit and healthy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: science
...t, others ponder that technological and science science are not healthy for them. Here , i woul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e science are not healthy for them. Here , i would like to account for both views ...
^^
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...cience are not healthy for them. Here , i would like to account for both views wi...
^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
.... There are multifarious benefits of this phenomena. First and foremost, science ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , people
... which give birth copious disease. Hence,people are likely to become the victim of chro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, thus, while, apart from, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14126394052 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68629861973 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613382899628 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => Sentence length is too short
Sentence length SD: 27.7435616931 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.8571428571 106.682146367 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.8095238095 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19047619048 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244005754792 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064761487647 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04124583118 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119153321705 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375450785782 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.64 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.