Many people go to university for academic study. More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that many people would prefer to pursue tertiary education at universities or colleges rather than enroll in vocational training courses. While I agree that vocational training should be strongly promoted, I do not believe that this kind of education is well-suited for everybody.
There are two primary reasons why more people should be vocationally trained. First and foremost, manual workers play a vital role in the construction and renovation of buildings. Frequent degradation in terms of existing buildings might happen without them. In fact, a maintenance staff is permanently employed in schools or hospitals in order to fix the damage and guarantee the safety of all who use the buildings. Secondly, there seems to be an imbalance in the labor force. These days the unemployment of university graduates has become an economic and social burden, while there is a shortage in manual workforce simultaneously. As a result, it must be a top government priority to provide more extra vocational training or even integrating it into the school curriculum.
However, there are several drawbacks to take into consideration before joining vocational courses. To begin with, this kind of training requires a huge amount of time and energy. People not only have to master their knowledge related to their chosen profession, but they also have to spend time on hands-on experience and skills to become highly-qualify tradesmen, which sometimes may lead to mental and physical exhaustion. In addition, those doing vocational training courses might face difficulties in employment prospects. Office staff tend to have a stable source of income; while blue-collar workers are likely to be prone to a lower level of salary and less chance to climb the promotion ladder.
In short, although vocational training should be adopted on a large scale in contemporary society, it requires consideration in whether to take it or not.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, in fact, in short, kind of, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30618892508 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02428218247 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615635179153 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2410367748 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255367615484 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075065979879 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679402276239 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151076756441 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061217537359 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.