Many people prefer to watch foreign films than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
Many people prefer to watch foreign films than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
In the world of today, the modern method of entertainment is to show movie but some people more prefer foreign films than thair nation films. This essay, as my point of view, leads to, will elaborate more about the reason people doing this as I believe that the government should promote local film-making by the subsiding industry.
There are various reason why many people find foreign film more enjoyable than the film produced in their own countries. Firstly, the Budget for foreign movies are higher than the other. So that they can use various types of action and special effects and costly short screens. As a result, this movie is become more attractive as well as cheaply because this movie release in the international market so that they earn more money than national film. Secondly, the language problem prevents people to watching movies. In the same way, the Internation movie is edit in various language so people prefer foreign movies.
In my view, the government should support local film industries financially. In every country, lots of talented directors who just need to opportunity to prove themselves. To compete with big-budget production films. In addition, the government introduces some actresses through hosting events because if people become more familiar with the actress than they watch their film. What is more, nowadays people also want high-quality movies because individuals also have a projector and smart television so they prefer a High-definition movie.
In conclusion, Increase financial support could help to raise the quality of local made films and allow compete with foreign production.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...port local film industries financially. In every country, lots of talented directo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my view, what is more, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32167832168 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61371061943 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548951048951 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5345803829 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5294117647 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.609018344962 0.244688304435 249% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212314055733 0.084324248473 252% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183656397276 0.0667982634062 275% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.420386562938 0.151304729494 278% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.266880085196 0.056905535591 469% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.