Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?
Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
It is true that people are likely to opt for foreign movies rather than domestically produced ones. There are several reasons for this, and personally, I think the government should not support local film producers financially.
The main reason put to explain why people favor foreign films over their local ones is the superior quality they could produce. Thanks to their high budget, foreign filmmakers are more able to invest in special effects and content than local producers. Take “Kong” for example, generous budget enables the film crew to arrive in one of the most spectacular destinations in Viet Nam – "Ninh Binh" to shoot their film. That is not the case of domestically produced films, which most of their scenes take place in only one or a few places inside the country. In addition to the shooting, famous cast and their capabilities of acting in foreign productions might be a plus to the viewers.
In spite of the locally produced films’ weakness, the government should not be made to subsidize film industries. Indeed, there are many other areas that in more urgent need of government’s financial aid. As entertainment activity is of expensive luxury, should this sector of the entertainment industry be funded, there is no sound reason for the government to deny any area’s request for financial subsidy. This will inevitably lead to a shortage in public fund, possibly putting more pressure on the taxpayers.
In conclusion, limited budget to invest in quality enhancement is what put local movies in a disadvantageous position in their own domestic market. However, the government should not financially intervene in as there are other areas should be prioritized.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26811594203 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01275033255 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6626074425 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.846153846 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414234017905 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144322986496 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929830540276 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248434886819 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752247920456 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.