Everyone should adopt a vegetarian diet because eating meat can cause serious health problems.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that adopting a vegetarian diet could be greatly beneficial in terms of avoiding serious health issues that a meat diet can cause. I partly agree with this view, however, people could otherwise choose to take less meat and add more vegetables to their diet.
On the one hand, a vegetarian diet can have a positive impact on people’s health. People who choose to abstain from meat are known for having a greater life expectancy than those choosing not to. This superiority of longevity of vegetarians have over meat-eaters could be explained by the very detrimental nature of animal fats. Particularly, fats derived from animals are more likely than those from plants or fruits to cause arteriosclerosis which mainly contributes to premature old age and its following medical problems. Moreover, an excessive intake of meat, especially of high-fat meat, could greatly enhance the levels of stress, and even worse, cause people to be more liable to plunge into depression.
However, conversion into vegetarianism is unnecessary should people can properly alter their diets. Increasing the proportion of vegetables in one’s diet while at the same time cutting down on meat is a viable alternative to a complete non-meat diet. By doing this, people are able to enjoy the advantage and enjoyment of a meat diet while helping them less liable to many medical problems associated with consuming red meat. On the other side, since most people have long been accustomed to taking meat a complete transition to a non-meat diet could be arduous and challenging to some. Besides, a vegetarian meal at present which is adequate to the body and pleasing to the palate involves much expense of time and energy, so that a quasi-vegetarian one which does not require a full commitment of abstinence from meat could be a more preferable option.
In conclusion, vegetarianism could greatly benefit people's health. However, a scientifically balanced diet which still allows people to eat meat could be preferable to those who cannot give up meat altogether.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 717, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more liable to plunge into depression. However, conversion into vegetarianism i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1671641791 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92681049062 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570149253731 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0318513721 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.642857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272656531551 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107024521304 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619399066802 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184404183848 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453952788259 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.