In the past, people spent the entire life doing one job. But nowadays, they change their jobs frequently. Give reasons.
It is true that people in the modern world move from one job to another more often than they were in the past. There are several reasons for this and solutions to solve this problem.
On the one hand, there are more employment opportunities for a person now than they were twenty years ago. As globalization has paved the way for the expansion of multinational companies and direct investments into developing nations, necessary manpower is in high demand to feed the production. Moreover, employers tend to perceive their workers as temporary ones and not appreciate their commitment to the company on account of their likelihood of job hopping. Therefore, employees are not sufficiently invested in either the physical or emotional sense. These factors together have formed a vicious cycle in which employees find themselves more likely to steer their careers towards a different course.
On the other hand, there has been a remarkable change in employees’ attitudes towards their workplace. Employees are no longer willing to settle with one particular job or company merely out of economic necessity. Along with requiring emoluments to commensurate with their merits, they are also aware that self-improvement and - expression is needed if job satisfaction is to be achieved. For example, an employee may well be demotivated by not being delegated responsibilities though he or she can earn a lucrative income when holding the position. For that reason, if a company are not able to recognize and address these needs, they are on the verge of driving their workers, including the able ones, away from their existing workforce. Therefore, they risk wasting their resources that invested in these people.
In conclusion, there are various reasons to explain why people no longer devote much of their lives to one particular career or workplace. The onus is on the employers to adapt to their workers’ changing requirements.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26451612903 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01473653694 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590322580645 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4002820069 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234848343092 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779755001965 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656731722627 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148838749068 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199434034859 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.