In the past, people spent the entire life doing one job. But nowadays, they change their jobs frequently. Give reasons.
It is true that people in the modern world move from one job to another more often than they were in the past. There are several reasons for this and solutions to solve this problem.
On the one hand, there are more employment opportunities for a person now than it was in twenty years ago. As globalization has paved the way for the expansion of multinational companies and direct investments into developing countries, necessary manpower is on demand to feed the production. Moreover, employers tend to perceive their workers as temporary ones and not appreciate their commitment to the company on account of their likelihood of job hopping. Therefore, employees are not sufficiently invested in either the physical or emotional sense. These factors together have formed a vicious cycle in which employees find themselves more likely to steer their careers towards a different course.
On the other hand, there has been a remarkable change in employees’ attitude towards their workplace. Employees are no longer willing to settle with one particular job or company merely out of economic necessity. Along with requiring emoluments to commensurate with their merits, they also aware that self-improvement and - expression is needed so as to gain job satisfaction. For example, an employee may well be demotivated by not being delegated responsibilities though he or she can earn a lucrative income when holding the position. For that reason, if a company are not able to recognize and address these needs, they are on the verge of driving their workers, including the able ones, away from their workforce. Therefore they risk wasting their resources which invested in these people.
In conclusion, there are various reasons to explain why people no longer devote much of their lives to one particular career or workplace. The onus is on the employers to adapt their policy to their workers’ changing requirements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is and solutions to solve this problem. On the one hand, there are more employme...
^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...-improvement and - expression is needed so as to gain job satisfaction. For example, an ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 725, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e able ones, away from their workforce. Therefore they risk wasting their resources which...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24919093851 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01907911617 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598705501618 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5675022694 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.133333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234538448126 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772796522634 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672962276679 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149644696579 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243147492555 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.