Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be?
Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
In recent decades, films have been imported at an increasing rate and gained a lot of public attention. While there are several reasons behind this phenomenon, governments should take consideration into investment in the local films industries.
There are number of compelling explanations why people have a preference for foreign films and TV series. First, it is undeniable that foreign films seem to be more attractive and abundant than local ones with appealing motion pictures and talented actors in various genres. In fact, local film buffs often pay a lot of money to go to movies from other countries, especially the haven of silver screen like Hollywood. Second, thank to foreign films, local residents can get more ideas from overseas to obtain the opportunities to integrate into globalization and to fix their existing flaws for getting perfected. For example, South Korea culture has fewer flaws than North Korea one since it is more open for imported films.
However, the government should give more financial support to improve domestic film industries because of their benefits of national culture. First, motion pictures are an effective way to crystallize and project the intangible element of culture. Therefore, if local films are primary focus, viewers would find it easier to understand the beliefs, values, and assumption of culture, which can be difficult to achieve by using written forms. In addition, producing more local movies will enrich the cultural library. For instance, by being taken care of government in the film industries, the Indian culture seems to be more vivid and unique than other nations with fewer local works invested.
In conclusion, foreign films play an integral part in the moral films of people and there are several reasons for that. However, local officials should recognize the benefits of local films and have suitable attention to them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29139072848 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66123007647 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592715231788 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9083299983 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.142857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45275732596 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148803427094 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075429816174 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262081375259 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496714315314 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.