Many people say that companies should give importante to their employees, whereas others say that they should give importance to customers.
Discuss both and opine.
Most companies give better services to their customers and their employees. Some people believe that companies needs give more importance to their workers while others do not. This essay will discuss both views of the given argument and why customers are superior.
Providing more attention; to employees than customers improve higher performance to companies. If companies give more facilities and build a better working atmosphere for their employees, workers get positive vides and become more satisfied with the administration. For example, the result of a survey, Apple provided good conditions for their employees and better salaries, which was a reason for their success. As one of the best companies in the world. In short, employees work hard, enhance their performance, and give their one hundred percent efforts to the companies otherwise, which is not possible if companies only listen to their customers.
However, by giving more better experiences to customers, companies gain the trust of customers. Ultimately, companies performed well in the long run. When customers find good quality products in a company, they suggest products to their relatives, friends, and loved ones. For example, Google always focuses on better customer experiences, which is a reason for their performance because they serve their customers as God. Overall, customers are ultimate the buyer, who decided a particular product has worth buying or not, which most important thing for companies.
To conclude, giving importance to workers in a company, they improve the overall performance, whereas customers are very important for any company because they decide about a particular product. In my words, although providing more attention to buyers not gives short-term benefits to companies in terms of profits, which will be a key for success in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-29 | NAFIJA KHANOM | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-11 | rajpatel90 | 85 | view |
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 87
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 73
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think governments should spend less money on arts and invest more in education Do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sports people and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sports 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., which was a reason for their success. As one of the best companies in the world....
^^
Line 6, column 20, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... their customers. However, by giving more better experiences to customers, companies gai...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, whereas, while, for example, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49477351916 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79414702276 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550522648084 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.115744007 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289264643536 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111965889534 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659337093831 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18718262194 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682203533197 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.