Many people say the gap between rich and poor people
is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow
poorer. What problems could this situation cause and what
measures can be done to address those problem?
The growing disparity between the poor and the rich is inevitable when an economy booms as well as has a miracle growth. Although the gravity of situation comes from many factors, we totally cover the distance.
There are many reasons explaining why we have different social status in the world. First, lacking of educational infrastructure is the main reason of prolonged poverty. The employers just want to hide well-trained workers to guarantee their bottom line, as a result the rest of worker class whose competence as a workers is not good cannot grab a slice of labor market. Second, the proliferation of population drives many families to be stuck in the dire financial straits. The extra mouths quickly wiped out the food surplus so they cannot afford to the basic need of life.
It is heartening that we can put in a front when the distance between upper-middle class and lower-middle class is more viable as we are capable to solve it. The government should enact baby bond policy to expose everybody to higher-quality education. As a result, those who are labeled to be destitute from cradle to funeral have more opportunity to finance a debt-free university and access capital to start a business. Moreover, the authority figure needs to use propaganda to have more inhabitants approach to information helping them control recreation. Having less children means that parents are no longer under stress due to financial problem.
The wealth gap is caused as a result of industrialize process. We totally have the capacity of eradicating the distance if we know exactly where it stems from?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a worker' or simply 'workers'?
Suggestion: a worker; workers
...est of worker class whose competence as a workers is not good cannot grab a slice of labo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bor market. Second, the proliferation of population drives many families to be st...
^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun children is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...helping them control recreation. Having less children means that parents are no long...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, so, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04135338346 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86078369134 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65037593985 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2816089694 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.08983271442 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297444059628 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360691407741 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586723047903 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427333257741 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.