Many people think that the effective way to reduce pollution is to tax the companies which cause it. Others think that that there are better ways to achieve to achieve this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Most people agree that the industry-caused contamination should be reduced to some extent. However, imposing higher taxes on companies is a controversial tactic, due to possible alternatives. This essay will discuss the debate, and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who support higher taxation of industry promote the idea that this measure will lead to lower energy consumption, and thus lower emissions. They point to evidence from countries such as Sweden where this appears to be the case, and urge other nations to follow suit. Another argument is that high taxes may lead to companies, modifying their manufacturing process in order to become more efficient, eventually resulting in lower amount of waste produced.
By contrast, opponents of this view are able to cite evidence from other countries( including Italy and France) where high taxes has apparently not reduced industry- related pollution. In these case, the effect has been to face majority of companies with financial crisis, resulting in downsize or even closure in some cases. The first solution that critics propose instead is changing energy sources used by companies. By this they mean that it would be for government to create renewable energies by funding, for example, solar or biofuel reactors, and then encouraging industrial consumers to use through tax incentives. One other suggested step is the development of controlled landfills and waste processing facilities, so that the waste might be treated more effectively regardless of the amount dumped.
Overall, I tend to side with those who oppose heavy tax burden towards the industry to lessen the pollution induced by them. It appears that the government’s intervention to serve alternative sources of energy and improved waste treatment amenities for companies well ameliorate the situation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, for example, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46341463415 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92749702023 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630662020906 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1678984388 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.615384615 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144525856909 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527146868725 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039699287701 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932422000707 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525743171033 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.