Many supermarkets are selling more and more products that are imported from other countries instead of selling food that is locally sourced.
What are the reasons for this?
Is this a positive or negative development?
Importing and exporting of goods from one nation to another becomes prominent factor in contemporary settings. By followed this, most of supermarket are willing to sell maximum of imported goods of foreign companies rather than of locally produced sources. There are plethora of reasons due to which this trend is happened as well as this represents overall negative progression. Couple of views are explained in forthcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, importation and exportation of goods become proliferate with innovations in modern era. Due to which, supermarkets sell foreign imported things and avoid local producers which results to plenty of reasons. First and foremost is globalisation in which foreign nations reveal to exchange goods. In this criteria, such imported goods include superior quality, quantity and huge classification in variety. Due to which, taste of individuals become change and they promote such goods. For instance, genetically modified crops are foreign items which provides numerous favourable aspects to farmers such as promotion of yielding, disease resistancy and so on. In addition, proliferation in industrialisation and business sector is another major concern. In this notion, such sections become maximized. Because of which, foreign factories become set up in one another's nation which leads to importation and production of innovative items. This results to proliferation in quality and quantity which provides to public.
It is worth considering that, it leads to overall negative impression. Because, if these goods become exchange by avoiding local sources. Thus, this may leads to destruction in agriculture skill and adverse impact on income of farmers. Because, if foreign goods become promote by individuals, therefore, local sources which is produced by local workers become minimise. This results to decrease in employment and earning. Moreover, this also leads to burning of fossil fuels via trasportation due to which, natural resources become demolish. Because, there are numerous ways of transport which are used to generate on fossil fuels. This results to release of harmful gases in atmosphere which leads to global warming.
To recapitulate, from my prospective, although there are major factors due to which supermarkets used to sell import goods rather than local once. Whereas, this also promotes negative progression for both public as well as environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: FOREIGN_IMPORT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'imported'.
Suggestion: imported
...rn era. Due to which, supermarkets sell foreign imported things and avoid local producers which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...gn nations reveal to exchange goods. In this criteria, such imported goods include s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ich, natural resources become demolish. Because, there are numerous ways of transport w...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...es negative progression for both public as well as environment.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64931506849 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97607145639 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52602739726 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.0 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.637678618 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9166666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2083333333 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209472786801 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662543337603 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556367631179 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168899032459 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575411758789 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.