Men and women are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males and females from certain professions because of their gender?
There is no shadow of doubt that each gender has their own good points and bad points. It is argued that there are some certain vocational fields in which men or women should be rejected. From my perspective, keeping out male or female workers from a job is completely reasonable in blue-collar jobs; however, in white-collar fields, men and women ought not to be eliminated due to their gender.
In term of manual jobs, employers should hire only men or women working in their companies. Selecting gender likely boosts productivity and effectiveness of work. These works require creating a large number of products within a short time. Having strengths, therefore, helps each gender work effectively and quickly without making mistakes during working time period. For instance, in textile industry, companies exclusively opt for female workers due to their patience and cleverness; by contrast; builders and constructors are virtually male because with the strong constitution , they effortlessly work outside for long hours.
In view of non-manual occupations, it is not appropriate to propose the thinking of getting separated between males and females. Firstly, both male and female white-collar workers have contributed the same level of intelligence and creativity in society. Thus, there are no limitations that men can execute , but women can not. Secondly, knowledge works offer more training and internship opportunities. Staffs, therefore, have more time to get involved in work and overcome obstacles about their weaknesses.
In conclusion, it is not completely true to release that we should eliminate men or women out of a certain career. In my opinion, in manual works, it is necessary to divide men or women in each work. Nevertheless, in brain work, both men and women should be selected to work in the same career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s of work. These works require creating a large number of products within a short time. Having st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of work. These works require creating a large number of products within a short ...
^^
Line 2, column 581, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ale because with the strong constitution , they effortlessly work outside for long...
^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urs. In view of non-manual occupations, it is not appropriate to propose the thi...
^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... are no limitations that men can execute , but women can not. Secondly, knowledge ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28082191781 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94922085495 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585616438356 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1672203735 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.375 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257526851073 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818494857175 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049063344446 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162677148911 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482452419069 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.