Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. Some people argue that the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth. Do you agree or disagree?
Throughout the history of mankind, it is true that people around the world had different views in terms of the role of space exploration when a great deal of money have been invested in this sector. In my opinion, while I agree that enhancing living standards of humanity is the top priority of the government, I still believe that the investment in space research can be paid off someday in the future.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why pouring money into raising standards of life of inhabitants is far more pivotal. The first reason to support it is that many regions on Earth are enduring economical deprivation, which deserve immediate government funding. To illustrate, we can see from thousands of people in Africa, a country which is infamous for poverty, are starving in the default of basic necessities such as food or eventually fresh water. Therefore, money should be directed toward this region to eliminate poverty and help the locals climb higher in social ladder instead of squandering on space programs. Moreover, subsidizing educational facilities and quality could also be vital and desperately need investment from ministries themself. Without diverting heavily in such area, literacy and numeracy rate could drop in the foreseeable future, not to mention national economy could also be in recession in the long run.
On the other hand, I believe that space research could benefit inhabitants as well to some extent indicating that its might help deal with overpopulation and natural crisis resources. It stands to reason that we human beings have been facing unprecedented overpopulation and resource problem in many recent decades, which can be tackled only by discovering habitable planets and mining on there. Conducting universal travels could, therefore, bring a solution if astronauts could find other non-earth planets that accommodate the huge number of residents all over the world. Humans are also encountering the crisis with regard to natural resources scarcity such as rare metals and oil, which might flourish in other planets. If, for example, these planets could be sought out, then it is highly likely that World Wars for the purpose of resources could no longer exist.
In conclusion, it seems to me that although the mission to improve living standards of ordinary people is greatly important, the investment in space travel could also value considerably.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...poverty, are starving in the default of basic necessities such as food or eventually fresh water....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 639, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...ering the crisis with regard to natural resources scarcity such as rare metals and oil, w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23453608247 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78291684314 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59793814433 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.3911897792 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 145.071428571 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163578435707 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550423159041 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442071281162 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112164460969 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357138665695 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.