The arrival of the advanced technology has markedly influence human life in various aspects. In terms of listening to music and reading the books, before the emergence of internet, people could only do this by listening to radio or going to the bookstore. However, nowadays people are able to download any music and books for free. I believe this development is negative to the society, and the opinions would be elaborated in the following paragraphs.
It is immoral unethical to download the music and books on the internet for free. The writers of the book and the music makers spare no effort to accomplish their tasks which their livelihood depend on. However, people are entitled to download the popular music and renowned book story arbitrarily on the internet. For illustration, recently, people around the world are capable of downloading the music uploaded in website called “Youtube” for free. This not only breaches the social norms of moral and ethics, but also damages the value of writer and music composers. As a result, it is unjustifiable for people to download the music and books for free on the internet.
Apart from the reason argued above, downloading the books and music for free on the internet is detrimental to the music makers and writers. Once people are competent to possess the complimentary music and books, they are unlikely to buy the album and books in the music market and bookstore. In this case, there would be notable stagnation and diminishing in the sales of the album and books. Subsequently, the incomes of the writers and music makers may curtail.
Admittedly, the availability of the music and books on the internet is impartial to every individual and the entire society. In this case, certain underprivileged people could access to the music and books without paying. However, I opine that every person is supposed to be charged due to the fact that we should conform to the norms of ethics and morals.
To conclude, as argued above, I am convinced that people should be limited to download free music and books on the internet because it is immoral and would jeopardize the livelihood of the writers and music makers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'influenced'.
Suggestion: influenced
...of the advanced technology has markedly influence human life in various aspects. In terms...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, apart from, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77617669919 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446575342466 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1955162753 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.388888889 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2777777778 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329399352681 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12518870383 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879892676675 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191220531279 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677195415994 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.