In the modern world, many children spend a lot of time in front of computers, televisions, and smartphones. This is very harmful to them.
To what extent do you agree?
In the global era, most of children are interested to connect with gadget such as computers, televisions, as well as smartphones than interact with people. The important aspects of this reality are is most of them are becoming apathy, no sympathy, as well as less care to the others. In my view, I agree with the statement above that this reality is very dangerous for them. I hold this view for some reasons which are set out below.
To begin with, I would like to argue that the main negative impact of gadget for children are most of children who take their time a bunch for gadget are gravitate to failure to create and maintain their peer groups. The consequence of this reality is most of them always feeling alone. Referring to Research Centre for Critical Psychology Leiden University stated that children who always feeling alone are easily be depressed.
On the other hand, children who spend a lot of their times for gadget are difficult to communicate properly with the other. this reality occurred due to they always prioritize to their gadget which it triggered them for limiting their respect to others. The data from International children Initiative (ICI) showed that 65% of children in the digital era gravitate to reserved and unrespectable.
However, some people still believe that there are many positive impact from gadget for children than its negatives. Unfortunately, there is little evidence to support this view.
taking into consideration, I believe gadget are harmful for children due to its could be implicated to the difficulty for children for maintaining their peer groups and communicate with others properly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the children') or simply say ''most children''.
Suggestion: most of the children; most children
In the global era, most of children are interested to connect with gadget s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the children') or simply say ''most children''.
Suggestion: most of the children; most children
...ative impact of gadget for children are most of children who take their time a bunch for gadget ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gravitated'.
Suggestion: gravitated
... take their time a bunch for gadget are gravitate to failure to create and maintain their...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...to communicate properly with the other. this reality occurred due to they always pri...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Taking
...ittle evidence to support this view. taking into consideration, I believe gadget ar...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, well, such as, as well as, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08088235294 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69658529104 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533088235294 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9303903506 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.307692308 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167396984163 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694316903133 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314826470143 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990195371793 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319420242219 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.