In the modern world, people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or product from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

In the modern world, people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or product from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that it is no longer necessary for people to kill animals for food and other products such as medicine and clothing. Personally, I think there is little to disagree with this assertion, as I will explain now.

Firstly, slaughtering animals for food is simply unnecessary as we now can grow vegetables sustainably to meet our survival needs, depending much less on weather conditions thanks to advances made in the field of agriculture. Of course, one might argue that animals' meet contains high amounts of protein, which is essential for muscle growth, healthy blood and organs in human body, while most vegetables seem to lack this vital nutrient. However, we can always offset the lack of protein in our diet by eating protein-rich vegetables like spinach or broccoli, rendering eating food from animals to get enough protein unnecessary.

Besides this, it is not a necessity that we use animals for the production of medicine and clothing. With regard to medical products, most medicines now are already being synthesized and mass produced by pharmaceutical companies worldwide, and this can be seen in the production of aspirin, antibiotics and antidepressants, to name but a few. As for clothing, killing animals for their skins or furs to make clothes, belts and shoes is no longer needed since we can also synthesize artificial materials that are of similar quality and aesthetic value.

In conclusion, we now could live comfortably without resorting to killing animals for food, medicine or clothing. I take this view on account of the fact that there is plenty of vegetables that could sufficiently replace animals' meet and that medicines and clothing materials can be synthesized, eliminating the need to kill animals for their skins, furs or medical properties.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, while, as for, i think, in conclusion, of course, such as, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23448275862 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91451735541 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3885510852 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.8 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262650614638 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122300079442 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985234264393 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181829586992 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759233260187 0.056905535591 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.