In the modern world, people no longer need to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
From time immemorial, animals have played a pivotal role in human’s life; they provide not only food but also medicine and clothing for people. Notwithstanding, it is thought that humans do not make use of these benefits from animals anymore. I, personally, contradict the premise because they presume to live without animals.
To begin with, the majority of food-providing for humans is related to animals, therefore, it is essential food. It is conspicuous that people can consume vegetables instead of meat, however, it produces transitory results, in comparison to animals. Animal flesh offers nutrients for human health, and humans have yet to discover a way to substitute them. For instance, pork, beef and fish are a treasure trove of nutrients which is beneficial for humans’ bodies to develop in height and weight perfectly.
Additionally, humans can deny the vitality of animals in the process of making medicine and clothing. When it comes to medicine, organisms act as laboratory animals in industry-medicine. When creating new vaccines or treatments for medicine, doctors and scientists are more likely to need laboratory subjects and nothing better than animals. The bodies of animals are fairly similar to humans’, therefore, researchers can gain precise results during the experiment. In terms of clothing, leather and fur are important materials not only for human well-being but also for making an outcome. Taking skin from crocodiles or skin from sheep as examples, the former can produce attractive and valuable products and the latter assists humans adapt with the deeper cool weather. Although humans can make clothes from man-made fabric, it is no longer durable compared to exclusive features from usable parts of animals.
To sum up, owing to the significant role of animals, humans should protect and have reasonable consumption of meat quotas to maintain animals’ value.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...humans is related to animals, therefore, it is essential food. It is conspicuous ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44630872483 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91410640255 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614093959732 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4844602559 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.2 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210812993633 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758726687307 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687251799145 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130021082075 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078210902072 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.