In the modern world people no longer need to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

In the modern world, people no longer need to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

From time immemorial, animals have played a pivotal role in human life; they provide not only food but also medicine and clothing for people. Notwithstanding diatribes from green-eaters and animal protectionists, I ascertain that humans presume to live without animals.

To begin with, the majority of essential food provided for humans is from animals. It is conspicuous that people can consume vegetables instead of meat; however, it produces transitory results, in comparison to animals. Animals’ flesh offers nutrients for human health, and humans have yet to discover a way to substitute them. For instance, pork, beef and fish are a treasure trove of nutrients which is beneficial for humans’ bodies to develop in height and weight perfectly.

Additionally, humans cannot deny the vitality of animals in the process of making medicine and clothing. When it comes to creating new vaccines or treatments, doctors and scientists are more likely to need laboratory subjects, which there is nothing better than animals. Fortunately, the bodies of animals are fairly similar to humans; therefore, researchers can gain precise results during the experiment. In terms of clothing, leather and fur are important materials not only for human well-being but also for their fortune. Taking skin from crocodiles or wool from sheep as examples, the former can produce attractive and valuable products, and the latter assists humans adapt to the extreme cool weather. Although humans can make clothes from man-made fabric, it is on no account durable compared to exclusive features from usable parts of animals.

To sum up, owing to the significant role of animals, humans should protect and have reasonable consumption of meat quotas to maintain animals’ value.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46350364964 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85437160573 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63503649635 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3978986225 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.153846154 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191049978243 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750840665495 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562074547721 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125395233171 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662727130599 0.056905535591 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.