More and more businesses, as well as individuals, are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating.
Many people prefer to have one to one conversation through technologies, rather than, having communication by face to face.
Firstly, the disadvantages of having a business conversation through technologies is a lack of time and interest. Many people are more likely to choose gadgets to use for work purposes and have meetings on through their technologies. If we try to look at our past, many people used to be jubilant as compare to the current era. Nowadays, most individuals are anxious related to work which lead them having exhausted day. Fewer employees are capable to complete their presentations or any document work through their gadgets. Technologies made adult people and adolescent so depended that it is impossible to do any sort of work not depending on these technologies. Office employees used to be confident and had great self-esteem to face their bosses and were superb with team works rather than, having a dull face currently and give with brief information related to their work perspective.
Secondly, there are many advantages of using technologies for communicating with people, nonetheless, technologies made our lives easier to search for any possible things, for instance, a destitute person finding a job with the help of approximately 10,000 applications in which, it makes easy for him to send CV or personal information through e-mail and getting reply back within a day. Furthermore, people have a great vocabulary during their interview, as they practice with different words provided by phone applications.
In conclusion, as the generation goes by the more advanced technologies modify, many people won't be irrefutable towards technologies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by phone applications. In conclusion, as the generation goes by the more advan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39393939394 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16224136201 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594696969697 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.3919277118 49.4020404114 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.454545455 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246687991697 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892014296893 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651906029261 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152797135673 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181611956767 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.