“More and more companies are allowing employees to work from home. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?”
These days, it has become more and more popular for some businesses to enable personnel to work from home. While I accept that there are some drawbacks of this decision, I would argue that it is better for companies to allow employees to work at home.
The option to stay at home and work is disadvantageous to some extent. The main short coming is that employees might not concentrate on their jobs because of families. As a result, personnel would not achieve high efficiency at work just because their children or anything else. In addition, documents and details which personnel share by their computers, laptops could be stolen by technology hackers. If hackers steal some crucial information, the businesses can fail and lose a great deal of money. It is not advisable that the companies take this option.
On the other hand, it seems to me that the companies ought to allow eployees to work from home due to some undeniable advantages. Firstly, it is safe for every people, especially these days. During Covid-19 pandemic, for instance, all companies must choose to continue working in the Internet. Therefore, it is the best measure to save people’ health without stopping working. Secondly, every peole tend to feel comfortable and relaxed at their home, so staying at home can help thay work effectively. As a result, their work are likely to be be more creative and active
In conclusion, I believe that there are many advantages for some companies to enable their employees to work from home, although this decision has some notable disadvantages
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: SHORT_COMING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shortcoming'?
Suggestion: shortcoming
...isadvantageous to some extent. The main short coming is that employees might not concentrate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: be
.... As a result, their work are likely to be be more creative and active In conclusion...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in short, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96946564885 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70936452677 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564885496183 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4660498789 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283962353554 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980222466523 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928193282817 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206182077841 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903419643344 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.