More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people suggest that the solution to this problem is to increase the price of fattening foods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is agrued that more and more individuals have become seriously overweight, some people advice that the method to this problem is to rise the price of fattening foods. From my point of view, i mostly agree with this notion because of its benefits for the citizen life. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the international world and with the appearance of modern technology individuals depend too much on fast foods and overweight is hugely dangerous for the adolesence. Not only can overweight lead terrible affection for the individual and community health, but also people immune systerm can be reduced significant, getting numerous risk troubles such as diabetes. Furthermore, the energy and mentality of overweight people can not compare with the nomal one, so nation development can be affected by this problem. To illustrate, there was a vurvey by Jennifer Kay, the famous science and professor which was about the success of overweight citizens in New York. The statistic showed that nearly everone made a plenty of mistake which is not neccessary.
However, we can not negate the drawback of increase the price of fattening foods for the individual life. A various of unemployment and poor people will not have opportunity to approach that foods. Moreover, many governments will take advantage from this revenus for their own profit, the hamful influence can be led by this action to the young generation.
To conclude, by my agrument from the essay that i totally agree with this statement, but it still have some nagative aspect for the teenager. The state need to have clear plans to improve the social life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the international world...
^^
Line 2, column 728, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun mistake seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of mistakes'.
Suggestion: plenty of mistakes
...istic showed that nearly everone made a plenty of mistake which is not neccessary. However, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y of mistake which is not neccessary. However, we can not negate the drawback ...
^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te the drawback of increase the price of fattening foods for the individual life....
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y this action to the young generation. To conclude, by my agrument from the ess...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...agree with this statement, but it still have some nagative aspect for the teenager. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06909090909 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70525414703 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585454545455 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3338491852 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.230769231 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255876466311 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867026269104 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112164604652 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158970664778 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105460636285 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.