More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people say that increasing the price of fattening foods will solve this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the recent time as individuals are carrying out a hectic lifestyle, consumption of healthy diet with fewer calories has been taken for granted. Consequently, this attitude has eventually escalated the number of people under the influence of obesity. It is argued by many that burgeoning the price of fat rich food can address this concern. However, I disagree with the resolution provided and I will explain why.
Hiking the price of fattening food can badly affect people coming from weaker economical background as they might no longer afford these fat products which is also an important part of nutritional diet. Furthermore, it is a myth carried by majority of the masses, that fat in all forms has a detrimental effect on cholesterol level. Notably, trans fat should be discarded from the meal not all forms of fat. Moreover, amongst carbohydrates, proteins and fats, fats has the least impact on the level of insulin in body. Consequently, variation in insulin level is one of the main causes of problems such as diabetes, thyroid and so on.
Individuals on the other hand also claims, increasing price will discourage people buying fatty products which certainly can result positively in reducing consumption of these foods from daily meal. In addition to this, it is also believed, this step will force people to investigate the reason behind the price rise which will eventually make them aware of the repercussion these products have on their physical health.
To conclude, I disagree with this thought of burgeoning prices as it can remove the required amount of fat from the platter of people belonging to economic deprived class. However, at the same time, I believe that public should be informed about the consequences it can have so that it can be consumed in a controlled amount.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09364548495 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78430052119 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585284280936 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4688312562 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.153846154 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17640283494 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621068294232 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560555555781 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110618433078 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456879014099 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.