More and more people are finding it increasingly important to wear fashionable clothes. Is this attitude to wearing clothes a positive or negative development?
It is observed that when most people enjoy high standards of living, there is an upward trend in demand for being well dressed. Most people take this tendency for granted; meanwhile, others hold opposite opinions. This essay is aimed at considering this issue thoroughly prior to arriving at a firm conclusion.
There are a number of different benefits to be taken into account when it comes to more people wearing fashionable clothes. To begin with, this trend might result in the number of high earners surging in each country recently. By and large, these people find it so essential to get dressed up on the grounds that fashionable costumes are assumed to be able to express not only their prosperity but also their rank in society. Also, the fact that developments of global fashion industries are significant deserves consideration. The growth of both local and international fashion brands have been flourished and fostered by consumers' demand for stylish garments, with the result that this tendency is a substantial factor to contribute to the wealth of national economies.
It is likewise worth mentioning several drawbacks of this issue. Granted that most people are willing to spend a large amount of money keeping up with the latest fashion, this consumer behavior forms a wasteful lifestyle. Another major drawback is negative consequences for the environment in case fashion corporations run non-stop/incessantly/continuously to fully meet the demand of consumers by producing items redundantly. Given the fact that their factories do pollute lakes and rivers by their raw sewage/outdated chemical treatment systems in developing countries, local residents are driven to serious diseases and poverty.
In view of the aforementioned discussion, I take the position that the effects of the fashionable wearing tendency can be a mixed blessing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-11 | Nguyễn Tuấn Kiệt | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | kartikpassi | 90 | view |
- Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities and towns leaving only old people in the countryside Why do you think this is Do you think this is a positive or negative development 92
- Some people think that technology is now an invaluable study tool for young people Others however believe that it is harmful for the studying process Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 78
- People should follow native customs and traditions when starting to live in a new country To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that technology is now an invaluable study tool for young people Others however believe that it is harmful for the studying process Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, so, well, while, by and large, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40068493151 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32830729954 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0201480069 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.307692308 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215496709067 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070434880605 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499640140881 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122355629844 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401198960502 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.