More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern life style which cannot be treated with modern medicines. Some people think that a return to traditional medicines should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree?
Nowadays, the modern lifestyles have led to plethora of health problems which are not easily treated with modern methods. Therefore, it is sometimes claimed that it would be better if people make full use of traditional medicines to get rid of these diseases. Nonetheless, I am totally against this motion.
At the outset, it is widely known that indigenous medicines were formed a long time ago, which may be only capable of curing some simple illnesses. On the contrary, health problems are mostly caused by modern lifestyles such as a sedentary lifestyle or eating a lot of fast food, stress or depression…, which are much more complicated and do not commensurate with some conventional methods. If people take advantage of these medicines but not contemplate carefully, in all likelihood, they will have to struggle with some side effects and other terrible results.
Furthermore, the elements of these traditional medicines may be risky, which not only can not be an efficacious treatment but also is very likely to do harm to people’s health. Initially, environmental pollution along with the erroneous techniques in the process of planting herbs can make them as not fresh as expected. In addition to that, it is possible for traditional doctors to make incorrect identification of the required herbs. As a consequence, this definitely can exert a negative impact on people’ well beings in sense that they may be poisoning accompanied by lead to other fatal diseases.
In summary, in my point of view, it would be much better when people find other remedies to their health problems as an alternative to folk medicines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e effects and other terrible results. Furthermore, the elements of these tradi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, in addition, in summary, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16853932584 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04994038868 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.407465914 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.454545455 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353187764774 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116009089497 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746914335356 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204546671793 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434171951994 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.