More and more people want to buy clothes, cars and other products from well-known brands. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In society today, the number of people who tend to purchase items such as attires, automobile and other things from big brand names is increasing. The reasons behind this trend will be outlined in this essay, in my perspective, this tendency brings both advantage and disadvantage consequences.
To begin with, the bias of using branded merchandises mostly stems from people's beliefs on possessions reflecting wealth, social status and appearance. In addition, commodities like clothes and accessories from famous brands like Hermés and Louis Vuitton with high quality and fashionable designs. Therefore, guys, especially young individuals, believe that those outfits are shopping list to update their outside. Additionally, some types of productions having a great value like cars from luxurious trademark are usually sold at exorbitant prices because of their expensive materials and unique features. Hence, these items are often considered as a tool for the rich to get social admiration and show off their affluence and social class.
On the other hand, more and more people consuming goods from globally recognised brands also bring alarming drawbacks. Only using opulent products has been killing those of less well-known brands and that has been afflicting local trademarks. For example, international mobile brands, such as Samsung, Apple, Oppo,.. are still dominating the smartphone market in VietNam compared to local mobile brands. Furthermore, there is a fact that youth assume that merchandises from up-market are status symbols and that has made many people get into debt. For instance, following a survey of People's Daily in China, young people in this country are facing " big trouble" because of the habit of overspending. Details, 53% of college student borrowed money to buy precious items such as Apple tablets or iPhone phones that can not afford to pay off debt.
In conclusion, the trend of consumer goods from high-end brands comes from people's perception of personal belongings showing their wealth, social status and appearance. Although this tendency can generate some benefits, I think the negative far outweighs such positive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ile brands, such as Samsung, Apple, Oppo,.. are still dominating the smartphone ma...
^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...le brands, such as Samsung, Apple, Oppo,.. are still dominating the smartphone mar...
^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Are
...brands, such as Samsung, Apple, Oppo,.. are still dominating the smartphone market ...
^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'brands'' or 'brand's'?
Suggestion: brands'; brand's
...e trend of consumer goods from high-end brands comes from peoples perception of person...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'belongings'.
Suggestion: belongings
...brands comes from peoples perception of personal belongings showing their wealth, social status and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54054054054 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76140781502 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63963963964 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5772294172 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.3125 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232975368475 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064024233242 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631487370493 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124129709256 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390281566897 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.