Under the background that the development of information technology has changed our life and society significantly, tele-work is becoming a more and more noticeable trend. While there are some advantages to working in the office, I do believe that working from home is more beneficial.
On one hand, there are several reasons that people disagree to work at home. Employers have more freedom at home, which resulting in low efficiency of working. By contrast, working with leaders and colleges will give pressure to workers. What’s more, lack of communication are more likely to produce loneliness if people work at home for a long period of time. Telecommuting workers can’t set the connection with people and teams in the industry.
On the other hand, tele-work benefits not only individuals, but also companies and society.
Firstly, the new type provides a more flexible method of working which save numerous time and money on transportation. According to a recent survey, it takes workers in Beijing average 2 hours to commute every day. While working at home, employers could spend more time on their own hobbies. Secondly, the budget to rental office and other expenses decreases a lot for enterprisers. Finally, it will reduce the possibility of traffic congestion, especially during rush hours and the air pollution by less consumption of fossil fuels.
After having discussed the most pertinent points of issues, I’m convinced that the advantages of tele-work outweighs its disadvantages, considering the benefits brought to employers, companies and city transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y significantly, tele-work is becoming a more and more noticeable trend. While t...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...iness if people work at home for a long period of time. Telecommuting workers can't set t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47580645161 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05222492669 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.641129032258 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2417586078 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319210665247 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103449798182 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929634628925 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152883679661 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129131548914 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.