This is definitely a negative development for it has given rise to many drawbacks.
The fist drawback involves negative effect on children`s health. Students especially those at young ages do not have strong abilities of self-control. They can be easily attracted even though they are clear that those fast food is demerit good which will threat their health. It easy to understand. For example, if children are required to made a choice between cola and water, then it is absolutely cola, which may cause obesity. In a nutshell, the decision of allowing fast food restaurant can bring harm to students` health.
Aside from the threat on students` health, the phenomenon also has negative effect on the formation of eating habit. It is quite important because it mainly affects people`s preference of dishes. If they are getting used to have fast food at young ages, then it is really helped for development of unhealthy eating habit, which is hard to be corrected in the future. For instance, it is difficult for Mexican to eat without chili, because it is not only their preference, but also is their eating habit, which is the most important factor. In short, the permission of setting fast food restaurant in schools could bring significant negative effect on children.
Tough people might not recognize the cost of consuming fast food, but it is necessary of us to be realized. For many countries such us China and Korea, fast food is a kind of import good, so it even generally more expensive than other dishes. Hence, different from what is happening in America that many people consume it because it is cheaper and they have no better choice. In short, especially for students in school, it must be a big amount of cost.
Of course there are many advantages. Undoubtedly, it saves time. For students whoa are missing time of lunch because of remaining assignment it will be good choice of them to buy some fast food such us hamburgers, which are portable and fast. Although it seems awesome, its drawbacks still outweigh benefits, which cannot be ignored by people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, really, so, still, then, for example, for instance, in short, kind of, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97727272727 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76063285317 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542613636364 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7109826016 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206209975304 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551679242205 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571959559726 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106983345655 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386970576923 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.