Some people think we should keep all the money we earn and not pay tax to the state. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, some people believe that we should not pay tax to the government, instead, we should keep it ourselves. In my views, I completely disagree with this opinion.
To begin with, living standard can be improved by exerting tax. Government use the money build infrastructure, and provide local dwellers with health care like medicare. For instance, parks usually be constructed, in order to benefit the neighbors. Then people living around can do exercise in the morning, what is more, family reunions can be held in parks. Moreover, parks could be micro-ecosystems that can help animals like birds to find another habitats, and plants in parks help create an environment which is full of oxygen. In another aspect, after people are retiring, they do not worry about their health care, because these are already included in taxes they had paid.
Goods which are demerit can be restricted. Tax can be introduced on price of certain products. High prices can discourage consumers` will of expending money. Demerit goods are something that is able to bring negetive effect to society. For example cigarette, wine, junk food and extra. As we all know, these goods are bad for health. However, less of the demerit good can be transacted and less affordable if taxes are introduced, and so that fewer people will be suffered. Also, tax can increase the cost of raw materials of demerit goods, and hence less people will be willing to produce.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the view which is supporting tax payment. Paying taxes does not mean tax payers lose. Instead, it advantages outweighs drawbacks, such us helping the construction of better living environment and higher living standard.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...be improved by exerting tax. Government use the money build infrastructure, and pro...
^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...be improved by exerting tax. Government use the money build infrastructure, and pro...
^^^
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...w materials of demerit goods, and hence less people will be willing to produce. I...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74714833593 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621428571429 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8806683481 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5263157895 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7368421053 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208475339092 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631378482657 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875885156307 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154969799785 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114211233147 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.