More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries. Why young people choose to do so? Who will benefit more: young people or the communities?
In recent years, there is an increase in the number of people in affluent countries who are interested in voluntary projects. This essay will outline some reasons for this trend, and several benefits which both volunteers and the communities can gain from this.
There are two main reasons, which can lead to the spread of doing unpaid work among young people. First, have short trips to developing countries provides young people with a great deal of rewarding experiences, leading to additional knowledge about different cultures. As a result, they have chances to enhance their life skills, as well as foster a sense of humanity and altruism. For example, when young people go to visit some underprivileged provinces in Vietnam, such as Quang Tri, they will have a good grasp of the misery and hardship of the local people. This, therefore, motivate them to do more voluntary work. Second, with respect to future career, people who get involved in many social activities are usually highly recommended by employers. Thus, they are inspired to benefit the community more through activities such as teaching or providing accommodation for poverty-stricken people.
The benefits which this phenomenon brings about are significant for both volunteers and the community. Young people who obtain new experiences and develop soft skills via extra-curriculum activities are more likely to succeed in career path. Besides, they gain more respect from other people after dedicating their time and effort to helping the impoverished. On the other hand, this practice provides the local community with opportunities to enhance living standards, although the impact can be considered relatively small sometimes.
In conclusion, young people from developed countries go to underprivileged ones to do voluntary work in order to gain more experiences and boost their future employment. As a result, both volunteers and the visited areas receive notable values.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44407894737 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92945500578 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572368421053 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4770661445 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385397540207 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118616314864 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762920613949 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229416878592 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642051227222 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.