In most of the countries, number of plants and animal species are declining. What is causing this? What can we do to change the situation?
Currently, the loss witnessed in variety and number in both plants and animals is indeed disheartening for entire world. There are several manmade factors responsible for this situation. However, appropriate measures can certainly help to tackle this problem.
To begin with, there are three major reasons that are accountable for loss in variety of plants and animals. To enumerate, deforestation is the biggest culprit, as trees and plants are cut down for development in infrastructure, urbanization, industrial estates and power plants which resulted to extinction of variety of vegetation. Consequently, animals rely on plants die out of starvation and lack of shelter. Moreover, globalization has given birth to immense industrial and economic growth causing huge pollution and global warming. Many animal and plant species could not withstand the weather changes, thus vanished. Finally, population is one of the major factors for this phenomenon. In other words, to fulfil the demands of mushrooming population fertile lands are utilized to grow cash crops and land of the wild life is snatched in the process leading to havoc.
However, the situation can be improved by taking some steps. Firstly, by creating sanctuaries many species of plants and animals can be protected. To explain, endangered plants and animals can be raised and saved in human restricted areas to prevent them from extinction. In India, for example, many wild life sanctuaries proved helpful to raise the number of Bengal tiger which was at the verge of extinction. Secondly, by implementing the strict legislation favouring the protection of such species can be helpful in saving their variety and improving their number. To illustrate, laws against cutting trees and clearing land must be enforced in order to protect environment. Furthermore, awareness among human is required to bring positive changes to the scenario.
In the light of all facts one can conclude that, most intelligent creation of nature is the most dangerous enemy of species that co-exist with him and unless he awakens, enlightens, it is indeed impossible to envisage a brighter future of this planet.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for example, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39940828402 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92878039983 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594674556213 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.804466936 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.388888889 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239621848572 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708869801107 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458473513862 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135513501935 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176898648111 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.