Most of the world's problems are caused by overpopulation. Do you agree or disagree?
Today, the world is facing many problems such as climate change, environmental pollution, out of resources, wars and social issues. It is argued that all of the above dilemmas are generated by over-populated circumstance and in my perspective, I absolutely agree with this view.
To begin with, overpopulation has been a head-aching issue worldwide. Firstly, about social matters, in fact, the amount of employment is not enough to supply for job-seekers, especially newly-graduated ones. With a huge number of candidates, employers have set up high requirements to find the most worthy applicants. As a result, people who inability approach with advanced education are very difficult to work at large companies or jobs that require high qualifications. This can explain why the proportion of unemployment in countries in the Third World is high. Secondly, a dense population means a decline in the quality of people's lives. Life in big cities, such as Beijing, is a good example of this as there is not enough space to accommodate everyone, so lower-class families having to live in very cramped housing.
On the other hand, regarding environmental problems, demand for owning private vehicles is more and more increasing and with today's air quality, the rising quantity of vehicles that release CO2 might provoke the more serious air pollution. In addition, people need fuel for their cars, from that, the needs for fossil fuel such as oil and gas is rising. These resources are unrenewable, and therefore teeming population will inevitably lead to the depletion of such resources quicker, potentially causing an energy crisis. Furthermore, human are destroying forests in which are not only the lungs of the world but also the habitat of many wildlife and plant. Consequently, a variety of animal and plant became extinct and environmental problems like climate change and polluted air is getting worse.
In conclusion, overpopulation has caused most of the world's problem and I believe that only if governments solve the population problem, other issues will be solved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
| 2024-11-25 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The chart below shows a comparison of di erent kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 89
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 89
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rs and social issues. It is argued that all of the above dilemmas are generated by over-po...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun wildlife seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much wildlife', 'a good deal of wildlife'.
Suggestion: much wildlife; a good deal of wildlife
...gs of the world but also the habitat of many wildlife and plant. Consequently, a variety of a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
..., overpopulation has caused most of the worlds problem and I believe that only if gove...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31212121212 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07871778732 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639393939394 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6548783324 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.866666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160065221403 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498891668939 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744673461707 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127643581463 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105471573896 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.