Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a growing concensus that countries should increase their investment in work training and skills that are relevant to working environment in lieu of academic education. I somewhat disagree with this view as there are distinct advantages associated with education provided by educational institutions, albeit the role of vocational study is of great improtance.
Universities are highly professional in imparting knowledge to students. The history of unviersities has marked for thousands of years, which allows these institutions to accumulate myriads of experience and knowledge upon educating the workforce for any societies. Additionally, university learners are equipped with not only specialized but societal skills that are primary for their career progression. It is a fact that many public figures once studied from the educational organizations including Elon Musk, Bill Clinton, Martin Luther King. More importantly, universities are breeding ground for valuable relationships among their learners. Apart from official learning hours, students have many opportunities to attend activities enabling them to forge bonds with other learners, which may act as a predecessor for later business partnerships.
Admittedly, vocational teaching plays a crucial role in the developement of any labor market. This provide the access to work market of many people who are unable to take part in colleges or universities. The means of education can utilize a large number of manpower and restrict squandering social resources. However, these trainings are not thorough and stimulate creativity of attendees. It is therefore cannot replace the positions of universities.
In sum, I mostly disagree with the view that financial should be diverted to job training as it does not supply necessary qualities for people, even though it is beneficial for a certain proportion of the population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ies. The means of education can utilize a large number of manpower and restrict squandering socia...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, so, therefore, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74468085106 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18850924693 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656028368794 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9859924741 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223786381749 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646904932039 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436605413639 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126270130993 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418277868626 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.